Comment: you are totally missing the point. your post is silly.

(See in situ)


you are totally missing the point. your post is silly.

First, "Ron Paul" is NOT a common name.
Second, the person behind this site is NOT named "John Smith", much less Ron Paul.
Third, are you arguing this "John Smith" not only has Ron Paul's same unusual name but also LOOKS just like the Ron Paul we all know ... and THAT is why Ron Paul's picture is on the site?

Of course not. Instead you are making the lame argument that enriching a pimp by frequenting the prostitute is actually a good example of the "free market". Don't we don't all know that prostitutes are NEARLY ALWAYS recruited initially to their "profession" through unusual leverage (often physical violence but sometimes drug addiction; abject poverty; often as minors; sometimes "sold" by other people; often by trickery or connivance; usually after having been physically/psychologically/sexually abused in childhood; or other angles which makes the "free will" argument for the pimp just a transparent, Faustian rationalization)?

Of course we do. But you want to deflect this into a debate about "how many angels can dance on the head of a pin"?

Bill of Rights /Amendment X: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Do you need a politician or judge to "interpret" those 28