Comment: I wasn't aware "normal conditions" was defined

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Wow (see in situ)

I wasn't aware "normal conditions" was defined

In the constitution, supreme justice or not, the law cannot violate a constitutional right, that is not granted by the state.

I missed the part in the constituion were 3 feet of snow was enough to deny a natural right.

You missed the whole point of the ruling, I'm not sure if that's worse than kit saying you were completely ignorant of it.