Comment: A better question is why are you here?

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Equally... (see in situ)

A better question is why are you here?

Ron Paul vs. ronpaul.com is clearly a very important issue for you, having consumed the overwhelming majority of your 10 mos. time here.

You've made your biased opinion against Ron Paul very clear, charging him with "abandoning free market principles, attacking Ron Paul's fanbase, attacking things that Ron Paul himself had claimed to enjoy/respect" and therefore concluding he's "extremely stupid to start a war with his own fans".

Those are your words. You went from defending ronpaul.com on the grounds they're "propelling" (as you put it) the liberty movement. So I point out the fallacy that your own stated condition is no longer being met and your response is to vilify Ron Paul, adding that he started it. Nice!

OK, so why are you still here at the DAILY [RON] PAUL supporter website?

Oh, but no... you'd rather continually talk smack and then try to weasel out by sneaking in a, "I think it may be some stupid lawyer's idea" at the very last sentence.

Pfffft... I thought so.

If men are good, you don't need government; if men are evil or ambivalent, you don't dare have one.