I would think they would need a warrant to do that. I don't have a supreme court case right off hand and I'm about to go to bed so I'm not gonna look, but every state's law that I know requires a warrant for blood testing. Perhaps the supreme court has never ruled on it so I'm not sure. I'll look it up tomorrow. But regardless, it doesn't surprise me.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its o