The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: Registering is clearly cybersquatting

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: That is my argument, as well. (see in situ)

Registering is clearly cybersquatting

I don't find it to be an ethical practice. Ethical would be giving the website to the person that it's named after, is about, and obtained popularity/use only due to, upon request.

This also makes me beg the question - how is worth 250k when this website has to be run with donations? What are they doing so right? In my experience, doesn't update as frequently, doesn't have as much content, doesn't cover as many subjects, as, yet one is thriving while the other needs to be run on donations?

If that is actually the case it must be due to the name difference, dailypaul is not something a person would automatically assume contains anything, let alone a bunch of information on Ron Paul, while would be the obvious default for getting information on him. Most, if not all of the profit that makes, is due to Ron Paul... and now wants to get even more money in a big final payoff from Ron Paul. I can't see that as ethical.