But what if they did? That doesn't change the principles that Ron Paul championed: nobody's entitled to confiscate private property through a governing body.
Why didn't he make an issue of this in 2008 - 2012? Because he profited from their free labor and free promotional support. What was their opportunity cost of running that site for five years? Ron Paul doesn't seem to care. That's pretty lame.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site