Comment: It's not

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: This really reminds me of (see in situ)

It's not

the site that RP's after, as you said the current owners of ronpaul.com did "build that", rather RP's claiming that the name "Ron Paul" is sufficiently distinctive enough and has been associated with Ron Paul the politician, author, political commentary enough to have earned him a trademark for the name "Ron Paul", and that the domain name "ronpaul.com" is part of his trademark, which I agree.

The site can move to another domain name but let's be honest: people go there because it says "Ron Paul" not because he's offering a distinctive service so I think Dr. Paul will w1n no problem IF it is established that RON PAUL has earned his trademark, which IMO he did.

Again this is not about the site, the owners "DID BUILD THAT" and they can keep it, this is about the name Ron Paul which "Ron Paul BUILT THAT".

"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom — go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, an