Comment: Yes, which is why legally

(See in situ)


Yes, which is why legally

Yes, which is why legally speaking, RonPaul.com is his property. That's his trademark.

Maybe if the owner was ALSO named Ron Paul they'd have a case, but he's not.

Maybe if they were selling merchandise with the face and quotes of ANOTHER man named Ron Paul, they'd have a case, but they're not.

Ron Paul is both morally and legally justified in doing this, it'd be difficult to argue otherwise.