Comment: So, the Dailypaul.com doesn't

(See in situ)


So, the Dailypaul.com doesn't

So, the Dailypaul.com doesn't profit form Ron Paul's name? I realize it's not a huge profit but it is certainly about Ron Paul and it has his name in it. I am not belittling Michael's intentions at all but the same thing applies here. If he gets the name he gets it. That's fine. It's just my opinion if he cared about it so much he should have gotten it long ago. Trademarking a personal name is bullshit. Lots of people are named the same. So, you think it would be right to Trademark "John Smith" and sue anyone who has any derivative of John Smith? Johnsmith.com, .org, .net, etc???? It's just ridiculous.