Comment: I don't know the particulars but...

(See in situ)


I don't know the particulars but...

...Ron Paul doesn't own that URL. And it's not illegal to buy the URL of someone else's name. And just because you're famous doesn't mean you deserve something over someone who is less famous.

Is the story really that Ron Paul is essentially trying to legally control RonPaul.com? If so, that doesn't feel like a Ron Paul thing to do. Has he explained his side of the story on this? I'd definitely be interested to hear it.

Also, is any of the above inaccurate?