Comment: Pfft

(See in situ)


Ron Paul could have explained that to the owners of the site - ie: "The contract states weneed to arbitrate this through ICANN, so I will be in touch with them and look forward to working out the details with you through that avenue."
Has Israel read the complaint? It is LAME. He is claiming common law copyright to his name because he is so famous. Whatever his rationale, he could have displayed SOME form of common courtesy and appreciation for supporters who ran the site true to his vision, rather than making it a smear site.
Unless that is an Israel puppet with RP's hand up his butt, I really don't care what he has to say, either. Ron Paul is the one with his "name" on the line, he needs to step up. Explain it to me, Ron.

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.