Comment: Who's property is it ?

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Nonsense. Ron Paul IS (see in situ)

Who's property is it ?

The name Ron Paul is the trademark of Ron Paul.
Not for commercial use without permission of Ron Paul.

Ron Paul ask for his trademark back and the owners acted with malice, as the US courts have described it.

Did the people either read all applicable laws or hire counsel ?

When a free person engages in commercial activity in a free market are they obligated to follow the law ? Or is a free market absent of property rights ?

Big difference between a free market and Rothbard's anarcho capitalism........