Comment: There should NOT be

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Founding documents. (see in situ)

There should NOT be

any conflicting interpretation of this, since precedent was set with Minor vs. Happersett...

See Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 167-68 (1875)

"...(the unanimous U.S. Supreme Court explained that the definition of a “natural-born citizen” is not found in the Constitution and confirmed that “[a]t common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners”)..."

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/

O.P.O.G.G. - Fighting the attempted devolution of the rEVOLution
Ron Paul 2012...and beyond
BAN ELECTRONIC VOTING!!