To make it simple, it is an illustration of why the use of drones are unconstitutional and evil. You responded accordingly.
We were to imagine the post was in the news media, followed by the obligatory or perceived need for drones. You would be not just offended, but in desperate straits! Your post called for this illustration. You actually helped illustrate the point.
All you have to do is change the name to Dorner, with drones or us DP members on his tail, then imagine him possibly complaining... but then, we all know already that he is guilty!?
Need it really be said that I did not really think a real person named TelFiRE... etc. etc. etc.? :)