Comment: Mark of the Beast, The Church, & Honest Money

Bear with me for a minute, but it does indirectly tie into this subject. Like all nations, the Swiss are controlled by the Accuser of Man, but have primarily adhered to the saintly requirement for honest money.

Now, why in the world does the Christian church allow a debt-based currency to rule their financial affairs? How can the Christian church complain about the Mark of the Beast (simply a very PUBLIC and advanced form of BIOMETRIC) when it has allowed a cruder form of biometric as part of its financial affairs for at least a hundred years, namely a personal signature on a check? Until the Christian church outlaws ALL forms of biometrics, the leadership certainly can't complain about the Mark of the Beast nor are those leaders doing God's will. Gold and silver should be IMMEDIATELY required for ALL transactions within the Christian church. In fact, are there ANY Christian churches which actually DEMAND their financial affairs be conducted in gold and silver? Why hasn't the Christian church continually raised this subject in both political circles and the media? The leadership of the Christian churches better not complain to me about the Mark of the Beast when they already allow a cruder form of the mark, i.e. a personal signature, and conduct their affairs with dishonest (devalued) money. Christian churches actually DOING the will of God should be LEADING the fight to restore an honest and anonymous currency.

The Christian churches need to learn a lesson from the Swiss.