The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: You're on the right
You're on the right
You're on the right track.
The issue isn't whether someone can use a famous person's name .com for a fan site. Generally that is protected.
However, running a fan site using a famous person's .com domain does not mean they then have a loophole to get around cyber squatting & trademark law.
Trying to sell the domain name to Ron Paul is where they went wrong. Running a fan site was fine.
Ron Paul owns his name/brand/likeness/trademark whether offline or online, however the registrant of RonPaul.com somehow believes they have some sort of ownership over RP's name.
...
Replies to this comment: