The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: Sure. I see what you're saying,

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: I don't understand what your (see in situ)

Sure. I see what you're saying,

but no limitations at all? Shouldn't citizens get a say in what resources law enforcement can use. The citizens do pay for them. Also, the gun is probably a good analogy for a drone, but what about things that are inherently dangerous on their own, just by their very nature. Radioactive substances, compressed gases, an unmarked whole in the ground, or a swimming pool, to name a few. What do you think about limitations involving precautionary needs? I might be able to protect my pool with a fence, but would I be able to protect a nuke? Maybe, but probably not with my budget.