I was really hoping for real answers. You just gave more philosophical rhetoric.
I want concrete answers. I asked you stated to Michael "Stick Around..... :)" Stick around for what? To watch you dodge philosophically like a butterfly pretending to sting like a bee? :)
Come on man. Here's the proof that you're doing what I just said.
You state this here as if you're ready to throw down..
"However, for the sake of argument, I will assume that you have somehow proven speeding increases the danger of potential accidents by a marginal amount."
Then you say this contradictory followup.
"Provide some facts, evidence to support how much speeding laws reduce speeding and accidents so that I can compare/contrast."
If you were going to assume that I have proven my speeding issue so that you could answer it why go back and ask for those "facts" so that you could compare/contrast? (rhetorical by the way) :)
Patriot Cell #345,168
I don't respond to emails or pm's.
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, inevitable.