As the guy who created the phrase "Rand Hater", at least as far as I know, I approve of this. Rand is not a messenger for liberty so he shouldn't be a main topic on DP. I can guarantee you that a vocal, open libertarian cannot win the presidency in 2016. So what is the point of attacking a liberty friendly potential candidate who actually has a chance of winning? We can't have what we want so lets sit around attacking the next best thing . . anyway I think the anti-Rand Haters have succeeded at breaking the consensus that was forming that Rand is the 'Devil' or whatever these delusional people think, that's all I hoped to accomplish.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site