Comment: No

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: The problem (see in situ)

No

I know what the media told me.

Innocent until proven Guilty.

Would he have shot himself to keep from being captured, or did the ones who killed him make that decision Judge Dredd style?

Many dangerous, armed men have been taken alive and since they knew his location and he was under siege, time was on Their side not his.

There's no way they'd let him have his voice in court. From day 1 it's been clear it was a hunt to kill, not capture.

This isn't the way my country is supposed to operate. It appears to me those charged to protect (even criminals) became a "lynch mob".

"The Law Man" used to hold off the lynch mobs, even when EVERYONE knew a criminal was guilty.

imo