The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Comparing
Comparing
Bitcoin to Amazon's new "currency" or other virtual currencies like e-Gold, or Second Life's Linden dollars is like comparing gold to gold paint.
Sure, some people might value gold paint and use it on certain things, but it's unlikely to ever have widespread monetary value like gold has. The reason is anyone can create gold paint, there is no limit to how much they create, and the creation of it is done centrally. If a government wanted to clamp down and stop them manufacturing the gold paint they could do so since they know where to find them. This is why eGold and Liberty Dollar got stopped by the Feds.
Gold on the other hand is not centrally controlled. The value it has can't be squashed out by any government because people all over the world will still value it. Bitcoin is similar to gold this way. Note I didn't say Bitcoin is gold. I'm saying it has similar properties to it (by not being centralized) unlike other centrally made currencies.