Comment: intent

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: On your third point (see in situ)

intent

I didn't mean to say that I don't support succession at every level at any time. I'm just saying that right now, at the moment, succession at the state level is not viable. Even if you could muster the sentiment for it in a state, the vast majority are of a mental state to embrace tyranny as bad as what we have *and* you'd still have the remaining federalist union to deal with. It's just not a practical plan at the moment for anarchists. In short, I support it in principle, but in practice it's not a good idea at the moment.

Of course, the counties will be succeeding. Declarations are to be avoided, but in practice they will withdraw consent. I don't assume this will happen. It is simply the best geographic and political structure in which an anarchist society has a chance to take root at the moment. And it would be pretty easy under the right circumstances. Doesn't mean it's going to happen---means it should happen.

I'm not sure that I see your last couple paragraphs are addressing anything I've written, so I'll leave it to whoever you are addressing to respond.