The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Sure he did
Sure he did
First off, those he murdered had that same right and he acted a judge, jury and executioner.
Secondly, he did want his right to trial. He waived it when he murdered the San Bernadino Deputy and barricaded himself in the cabin and made no effort to demand his right to trial. All he had to do is negotiate his surrender, instead he continued to try and kill.
Remember, this thing started when he was not happy with the results of his internal investigation and defaulted any appeal to our judicial system. He took matters into his own hands and left his fate to the court of public opinion. I intend to make sure he is guilty in the forum of his choice.
So let get this straight, if this man had grievance against you and murdered your daughter and threatened your neighbors claiming the whole time he will no0t go down alive you would risk your life to safely detain this man to protect HIS rights to justice.
Any free man with your theories was free to go save this mans life, most elected to judge from the safety of their homes, daughter alive and family safe........
Replies to this comment: