Comment: That is definitely not validation

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: It's valid because (see in situ)

That is definitely not validation

All that is, is 'reasoning', or opining.

What bearing do these red herring hypotheticals of yours have to do anything we've been talking about?

And no the hell you DON'T get it!

I never said I don't like Rand, I said emphatically that I don't like being under the control of Israeli apartheid neocon AIPAC, and that it is Rand's alliance with the obvious AIPAC smear campaign against Hagel that i take issue.

You don't believe the GOP submission to AIPAC is a total affront to EVERYTHING American, I do.

Whether it is the biggest, strongest, or most corrupt PAC is also just speculation on your part.