Comment: Can somebody put forward a more logical argument against Rand?

(See in situ)


Can somebody put forward a more logical argument against Rand?

I am getting a little sick of all this Rand Paul bashing. Its not 2016 yet and it seems certain people are not fully reading or understanding his reasons for his actions before bashing him. Rand did not vote against Hagel, he voted to KEEP THE DEBATE OPEN ON HAGEL, which means he wants some more answers from Hagel before making his vote. Thats like asking for time to read a bill before voting on it. What is so wrong with that?

I respectfully suggest that all the people opposing Rand Paul please put their arguments against him into a more logical format. Once they do so I will be more willing to listen to their arguments. All I am hearing/reading right now is emotion, which is what Socialists and Obama-lovers feed off of. We Ron Paul supporters are better then that and can put forward more logical arguments. Not saying I agree with everything Rand is doing, but I have yet to hear real logic from the people who oppose him.

I'm Free like a Willy! Happy Day! Oops thats a bit of a cliche!