Comment: Dr. Paul is merely defending his intellectual property.

(See in situ)


Dr. Paul is merely defending his intellectual property.

Nothing more, nothing less. Some of us (including myself) do not believe in the legitimacy of intellectual property, but it is a highly controversial issue among libertarians. We can agree to disagree about it. Saying that Dr. Paul is tarnishing his legacy by defending his intellectual property is preposterous. It would be like the pro-choice libertarians claiming that Dr. Paul destroyed his legacy by being pro-life. There is no consensus libertarian position on intellectual property, as there is no consensus libertarian position on abortion.

Relax. :-)

"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."