Forgive me for assuming you actually 'thought' about the concepts you were presenting and all its consequenses. Your thoughts as presented in your comment constitute a vision of how you either see the world 'as is' or how you would want to see the world 'be'. If neither is the case then you need to find a better way to describe what concept it is you are trying to expound on.
And if you 'honestly' are somehow offended by my questions, does that mean I have caused an injustice by what I offensively 'presumed' to be my right of free speech when, according to the link you provided, which, since you provided it must mean you are in agreement with it - my freedom of speech falls into the category of some 'science' which alone "can tell any man what he can, and cannot, say, without infringing the rights of any other person." and you are the one who will regulate such speech?
Or is your accusation of 'snide' your way of deflecting critisism of beliefs/thoughts/concepts you have not fully reconciled?
Don't pretend to want to know me when you are obviously looking for any way to discredit my questions and not answer them by accusing me of being dishonest, IOW - a criminal according to your 'book'. Definitely ticked off by your arrogance and inuendos.
If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: