"Should a drug that produces sexual dysfunction for the majority of users and which doubles the risk of a suicide attempt be labeled as an antidepressant?"
Read that ONE MORE TIME - very slowly....
"Should a drug that produces sexual dysfunction for the majority of users and which doubles the risk of a suicide attempt be labeled as an antidepressant?"
WHY DO WE EVEN HAVE TO DISCUSS THIS? I am delighted to see someone ask the question, don't get me wrong... but it still just boggles my mind that this question needs discussion. PULL THE DRUGS OFF THE MARKET! Like, yesterday.
Comment: Let me repeat that question...
Let me repeat that question...
"Should a drug that produces sexual dysfunction for the majority of users and which doubles the risk of a suicide attempt be labeled as an antidepressant?"
Read that ONE MORE TIME - very slowly....
"Should a drug that produces sexual dysfunction for the majority of users and which doubles the risk of a suicide attempt be labeled as an antidepressant?"
WHY DO WE EVEN HAVE TO DISCUSS THIS? I am delighted to see someone ask the question, don't get me wrong... but it still just boggles my mind that this question needs discussion. PULL THE DRUGS OFF THE MARKET! Like, yesterday.
Ron Paul supports a new 9-11 investigation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH9nOWnp5G0
Replies to this comment: