Comment: The burden of proof.

(See in situ)


The burden of proof.

"Three hours of detailed 9/11 evidence is to be presented and considered in a court of law."

I have been in these arguments quite often. What I've found is people (rather pridefully) demanding to see smoking gun caliber evidence with it never even dawning on them that they themselves have absolutely NO EVIDENCE to offer that supports the official theory. Just ask them to prove it. What can they say, "Uhm...they found a hi-jacker's passport in the rubble". Even they don't want to claim that. It is THEIR burden to prove who did it. Not the truthers'. Whose ever position has led to the murder of a million+ innocents and trillions in tax dollars stolen is the person with explaining to do.