as "insurance" or a "savings account."
At the same time they were arguing to the people that it was insurance or savings, they were arguing to the courts that it wasn't. That's because government run mandatory insurance or forced savings is unconstitutional.
There are other threads here on DP about this. Do a DP search for Helvering v. Davis.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderator