Comment: You are jumping to erroneous clonclusions

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: So is that supposed to help (see in situ)

You are jumping to erroneous clonclusions

You responded to me within 10 minutes of my post, meaning you haven't even had time to watch the documentary. If you'd actually watch it you'd see that it does NOT claim that a plane did not hit the south tower. That is your incorrect presumption. Again it is a video of professional pilots explaining that the officially reported speeds are beyond what is physically possible for a stock 767 at or near sea level.

Being that there are many videos and witnesses to the plane impact, this means:

1) The officially reported speeds are a fraud.

2) The plane that hit the south tower was not a stock 767, i.e. not Flight 175, but another. This possibility is expanded upon in Pilots for 9/11 Truth's follow-up film, 9/11: Intercepted. It would mean that this aspect of the 9/11 operation was similar to an operation proposed by the Joint Chiefs in 1963, revealed decades later in the declassified Operation Northwoods documents, in which they suggest just such a plane swap as part of a false flag operation to be blamed on the Cubans. From p. 13-14:

8. It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner enroute from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela. The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba. The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight.

a. An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone.

b. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida. From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone will being transmitting on the international distress frequency a "MAY DAY" message stating he is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow ICAO radio stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the US what has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to "sell" the incident.