Comment: It is impossible to...

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: You can try to explain it (see in situ)

It is impossible to...

...strip God of having Love towards anyone, because God is Love by His very nature, and therefore EVERY action He takes whether through mercy or punishment is loving. It is impossible for God to do anything evil, and it is impossible for Him to do anything unloving, because He is Love.

So I agree that all these verses about 'vessels of wrath', 'hating' Esau, etc. reflect short-term acts of judgment, exile, punishment, etc. -- but all of this is done in the context of His Love, which is never separate from Him in any action.

You could also try to say that Christ was literally telling us to hate our fathers and mothers in contradiction to His other affirmations of the command to honor our fathers and mothers. Surface readings of the word 'hate' are not intended here -- it's a jarring way to say that we need to not prioritize any human relationship above ours with God.

But I agree with you: God can and will accomplish all that He sets out to do. He will not fail, and since it is plain from Romans 5 that the gift of justification was intended for the same all men that are perishing under Adam, and that therefore the scope of His will for people to be reconciled is universal (confirmed in Colossians 1 as encompassing all of the cosmos), I believe that all things truly WILL be reconciled as it says they will.

I don't understand why the Calvinist holds that God would be unable to demonstrate His glory by eventually redeeming everyone as they come to true repentance (the only way to pay the uttermost farthing in the outer darkness). If God showing grace to a Saul of Tarsus or a thief on the cross is a demonstration of His glory, how would His glory be diminished if He chose to demonstrate His glory through his consuming fire of wrath ultimately leading to the same end for all?