Comment: Are you sure you responded to

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: So you've seen proof (see in situ)

Are you sure you responded to

Are you sure you responded to the right person? You're challenging assertions I never made... you would need to clarify in the first place, because your question is not at all direct.
Have I seen proof that information can arise from non-information?
Are you talking about the perception of information or information itself? If the prior, that happens all the time, if the latter, it's a nonsense proposition because there's no such thing as "non-information" in nature. That doesn't even mean anything.

Do you want to talk about the validity of evolution or did you have something else to say?