The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: Is it becasue there is

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: I disagree..... it isn't (see in situ)

Is it becasue there is

1) Is it becasue there is initiation of aggression and therefore it isnt morally right?

(If this is the case please elaborate the actual initiation of aggression, as I am in agreement with you that only initiations of aggression are immoral, but fail to see how this is an instance of an initiation of aggression.)

2) Or is there no initiation of agression yet you still maintain that it was still not morally right for reasons besides initiating aggression?

(If this is the case please elabroate on your definition of morality that defines actions as being immoral that don't involve initiations of aggression, as I don't know that I agree that such a thing is possible.)