The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: Seems to make sense. But not a scientific proof.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Incorrect, the demonstrations (see in situ)

Seems to make sense. But not a scientific proof.

I don't dispute what you are saying. I believe you. But that's the thing. It's a belief.

What you write is scientific proof of nothing. There is one and only one standard which needs to be met. Repeatable tests yielding predictable, repeatable results.

Don't have that? Then you don't have scientific proof. Sorry. That's the beauty of science and logic. It's conceptually simple.

So, while I don't disagree with what you write, my OPINION and your OPINION about it are scientifically IRRELEVANT, unless they can be scientifically proven.

Either you have a scientific proof or you do not. You do not. Evolution does not. I'm sorry. I know that's hard for you to accept, but that's the simple fact.

Belief in evolution as scientific fact is a religious belief as it has not been and cannot be scientifically proven. It is a likely creation myth.