Comment: In an indirect way

yes, I think you did. Why even bring them up in a discussion about whether or not David Duke material should be allowed on the DP? The inferred message is that the smear campaign against RP due to some "racist" newsletters that he didn't write are somehow similar or equal to rejection of DD and his Zionism video due to his well known racialist attitudes. They don't go together and don't belong in the same conversation.

I'm not challenging anyone's right to free speech. I would just hate to see the DP wrongfully associated with DD through promotion of his video here. A ban on him here wouldn't preclude him from being promoted elsewhere. Private property and freedom to not associate are as valid as freedom of speech on websites.

I put Morris Dees and David Duke (and the organizations they're affiliated with) in the same scumbag category. Both have attrocious backgrounds that compromise them as good sources of information on anything. They seem to work well together in promoting the establishment anti-dissent agenda: One, a well-known X-KKK grand wizard and present Storm Front member associates himself with other innocent groups through promotion of a quality video with shared interests (foreign policy), the other, a well-known con man and fraud, adds the innocent groups to a "racist" list through guilt by association, then the MSM smears them publicly. There's nothing wrong with shooting the messenger when the messenger has irreparably damaged his own credibility.