Comment: From pubmed: "The main

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: I'm not sure why someone (see in situ)

From pubmed: "The main

From pubmed:

"The main findings were as follows. (1) A significant positive correlation was found between fluoride concentration in drinking water and uterine cancer mortality in 20 municipalities (r = 0.626, p < 0.005). (2) Even after adjusting for the potential confounding variables, such as tap water diffusion rate, primary industry population ratio, income gap, stillbirth rate, divorce rate, this association was considerably significant. (3) Furthermore, the time trends in the uterine cancer mortality rate appear to be related to changes in water fluoridation practices."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9002384

"Exposure to high fluoride concentrations in drinking water is associated with decreased birth rates."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8169995

"The highest fluoride content in bone ash was observed in women with severe osteoporosis."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7446020

"Decreased intelligence in children and exposure to fluoride and arsenic in drinking water."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18038039

... I'm sure there's more but that's from just 5 minutes of scrolling. Please read through this article:

http://www.fluoridealert.org/articles/50-reasons/

Between browsing pubmed, the article above, and the book I referenced, I could literally give you HUNDREDS of links to scientific studies confirming that water fluoridation is dangerous and unecessary.