Comment: No. He's not, and it wouldn't

(See in situ)


No. He's not, and it wouldn't

No. He's not, and it wouldn't matter if he was, so I don't see the point in the existence of this thread. I truly believe this question comes up so often(other than trying to dig up more momentum on the bigoted side of the conservative movement), because his eyes and eyelashes appear feminine. This means absolutely nothing. I've worked within LGBT culture all my life, and there is nothing culturally gay about him, at all. He's just as redneckishly heterosexual as the average man living in his state.