















The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Disingenuous sanctimonious blunderbuss
Disingenuous sanctimonious blunderbuss
IF he genuinely wished to form a coalition around liberty issues he's now in agreement with, I *think* he might have tried to be just a tad less self-righteous and insulting. I especially loved his stereotyping of Ron Paul supporters and helpful clarification that the founders thought up the idea of liberty, not we ourselves. I found telling how he described his rather vicious and slanderous name-calling of Ron Paul and mis- characterization of his positions as simply "not totally agreeing with him on everything." I found funny his categorically (again) denouncing the Occupy movement after accusing us of being hypocrites and insisting (did I even see a tear in his eye?) that liberty was all about being free to express one's opinions, whatever they are. (And aren't we as proud of him as he is of himself for defending Maher.) What an obnoxious, phony "plea" for harmony. I'm sure if Christie ends up the next president, he'll be playing clips from this show, saying with a sorrowful look and a shrug of his shoulders, "Hey, I tried."
Replies to this comment: