Comment: Another way to debunk the fallacy of the US "democracy"

(See in situ)


Cyril's picture

Another way to debunk the fallacy of the US "democracy"

For what it's worth, if it helps, another way to debunk the deceptive fallacy or downright lie of America as a democracy:

Democracy, noun.

Republic, noun.

Democratic, ADJECTIVE.

Both democracy AND republic make use of DEMOCRATIC processes - in the case of the latter, to purposely limited extents.

However:

HAVING THE PROPERTY OF democratic process DOES NOT IMPLY in any way EITHER being in a democracy NOR in a republic.

The argument's corner stone condition:

(C) this is necessary BUT NOT SUFFICIENT - IN EITHER CASES.

Stating otherwise than (C) pertains to APPROXIMATE and fallacious logic - EITHER BY GROSS IGNORANCE OR BY DECEPTION PLAN - betrayal against ideas through the abuse of language, and thus, against honest, rational LOGIC ITSELF.

Analogy - especially enjoyable by the geeky students, albeit accessible to anybody, I think:

A computer contains mechanical parts AND electronic components - e.g., mechanical : the hard drive; electronic : the memory and CPU, GPU components, buses.

Do the mechanical parts make the ENTIRE computer AN EXCLUSIVELY MECHANICAL DEVICE - e.g., such as the first typewriters a hundred years ago?

APPROXIMATE. WRONG. FALSE. LIE. FRAUD.

Nope, the computer DOES NOT pertain SOLELY to the ontology of "mechanics" (noun) - only because to its hard drive.

Indeed, a computer isn't as "raw" as a 100 year old typewriter - in their respective whole.

BINGO !

Hence:

THE LIE USED BY SOME LIBERALS - identifying "democratic" with "democracy" TO ERASE the notion of republic (and hoping nobody will notice) - HAS JUST BEEN DEBUNKED.

THOSE ARE BUSTED.

Note it's just as deceptive as another CURRENT RHETORIC TRICK - arrogantly openly defended by King ObaMARX himself in one of his "books" - THE TRAITOR:

seeing the Constitution as a living document - subject to TIME-VARYING interpretations by whatever political agenda(s) - instead of one which ought to keep a literal interpretation - FROZEN IN TIME (1776 to 1787) - only.

That is, another UTTERLY HARMFUL ABUSE OF LANGUAGE DONE IN PLAIN VIEW that we MUST fight against, FIERCELY - to restore liberty.

Makes sense?

'HTH,

P.S.
Engineer here. Who ALSO cares about the proper usage of NATURAL LANGUAGE. In French AND English.

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.

http://Laissez-Faire.Me/Liberty

"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius