Comment: No, I assume reports are

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: So you think they just (see in situ)

No, I assume reports are

No, I assume reports are commissioned to provide overview of empirical evidence. I'm betting you'd be correct to assume that those who use such reprots pick and choose and twist them to further than own aims -- as is evident from the infowars article.

This report, however, when actually read, certainly conveys that assault weapon bans don't decrease gun homicides, that magazine size limitations would take decades to make a difference, that registration and ammo tracking would be cumbersome and difficult and of limited value, and that buybacks are ineffectual.

A far cry from the statements in this "article."