Comment: In an 'ancap world' it is in

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Your argument falls apart right... (see in situ)

In an 'ancap world' it is in

In an 'ancap world' it is in fact not required that anyone agree on the nature of rights. They will, but they aren't required to do so. Why? An ancap world is consonant with human behavior. A collectivist world is not. All collectivist philosophy depends on ethical asymmetry.
The burden of proof is not on ancaps.
The burden of proof is on ye who assert what is moral for rulers, violence, is not moral for the ruled.
Full stop, you are done.