Comment: He is blind. If he doesn't know that much

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: What he is saying isn't irrational (see in situ)

He is blind. If he doesn't know that much

then how can he possibly be the missing speaker of the Liberty Movement?

Here is a list off the top my head regarding my concerns:

He misquotes Ron Paul
He blames incest on the mother
He announces taking care of the Malcolm X problem
He doesn't understand the constitution
His handlers say that God speaks directly thru him and then when he speaks he changes the scriptures

I may be able to go back and find more. But no, I do not think he is the missing speaker. The question mark is removed in my mind. And the question mark has been moved from Farrakhan to Granger.

Is Granger dragging Dr. Paul thru the mud as she sits on the GOP and holds people to the constitution when she cannot recognize whether Farrakhan upholds the constitution.

He certainly does not uphold trial by jury or the right to bear arms. Where is the free society? Liberty? No that is tyranny. IMO, he has a group of followers that will follow him right into tyranny.

Matthew 15:14 KJV
Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.