That their oath is their signature.
When you take an oath in court you are required to uphold it or be charged with perjury even though you didn't sign a document. Why would that oath be any different?
Ron Paul convert from the Heart of Dixie
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
E-mail address:
Comment: I would argue
I would argue
That their oath is their signature.
When you take an oath in court you are required to uphold it or be charged with perjury even though you didn't sign a document. Why would that oath be any different?
Ron Paul convert from the Heart of Dixie
Replies to this comment: