Comment: The Point?

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Oh freakin please (see in situ)

The Point?

What's the point of this post? It's just stating the obvious, but doesn't uphold your previous argument (which was based on an ad hominem fallacy).
My point still stands that slash-and-burn is not a vegan-only problem. Animals consume more so slash-and-burn techniques would be better suited for them (rape the land and kill the animal, then move on).
Vegetarians are generally more into sustainability, which is a major motivational factor why they cut out meat entirely.

Like I said, there's better reasons to argue for an omnivorous diet and I'd get behind you for support if you did this, but fallacies and rhetoric make me take a complete opposite stance based on principle. I'll side with logic and reasoning first.