Comment: It's completely valid to compare

people's perceptions of how wealth is distributed with how it actually is. Are you saying that the frustrations of the underprivileged don't matter to you and they shouldn't matter to anyone else? That's the ridiculous argument if ever I've heard one. It borders on justifying the banks to continue their quest to own everything.

I'm sorry if you don't see a problem with 1% or even .001% owning such vast wealth that they're are completely untouchable in any social, legal or moral way. For me, it's not ok. Not because it's not fair but because it wasn't accumulated fairly.

Why are so many so quick to leave CEOs out of the competition loop that they place everyone else in when promoting the free market?