The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Like I have said over and
Like I have said over and
Like I have said over and oaver and oaver again, the costs will bankrupt those who try this in a free market. Without a government, they will not be able to control the market, the most they could do is create some kind of business with anti-freedom as its product. This product which people like you, Mark, and FreedomsReigning would like to enforce on the rest of us, will cost you a lot of money -since without government you have no way of taking the money right out of people's paychecks- when you begin to see the actual cost, that will be the end of it.
You are going to have to make money in that system; with nearly unlimited competition -or the potential thereof- you won't be so eager to frivolously waste your money on nonsense because you will be spending more money then you would be earning. Therefore you -and those like you- would be heading directly into bankruptcy just like governments do. The only difference is that government have a special ability to pass the costs onto everybody including those who aren't even born; which is why they can continue nonsensical projects -like found in your nonsensical arguments- for much longer than they could ever be maintained in a voluntaryist system.