So define "engaged in combat," and even then.... the answer should still be no.
And while we are at it Mr. Holder, what about American citizens overseas? What about the innocent Pakistan women and children? What about non American citizens on American soil?
The real question should be; does the President have the authority to use drones on anyone, anywhere in this world at any time?
And in my humble opinion the answer should be no.
—
jrd is still here... kinda in a weird sort of way. She also just might be the happiest girl in the world because she got exactly what she wanted which was a perfect summer wandering playlist.
Comment: Exactly....
Exactly....
So define "engaged in combat," and even then.... the answer should still be no.
And while we are at it Mr. Holder, what about American citizens overseas? What about the innocent Pakistan women and children? What about non American citizens on American soil?
The real question should be; does the President have the authority to use drones on anyone, anywhere in this world at any time?
And in my humble opinion the answer should be no.
jrd is still here... kinda in a weird sort of way. She also just might be the happiest girl in the world because she got exactly what she wanted which was a perfect summer wandering playlist.
Replies to this comment: