To recap the OP:
Ron was never able to get media support, while Rand has. The OP isn't saying Rand is truer or a more powerful speaker. They are simply saying Rand accomplished a great hurdle Ron was never able to leap, due to his reputation and incredible ability to lead.
Personally, I think Rand has consistently done a great job on MANY issues I hold dear, while failing on a few. Regardless of who is praising him, I am grateful for the media exposure. Remember folks, media is ALL ABOUT EXPOSURE and the masses hearing ideas repeated over and over. If the masses come to believe Rand is a more down-to-earth candidate than Hillary come 2016, we will have ourselves a winner. And even if as president, Rand pushes 3 out of 10 very very important issues, it will be a victory because right now we are losing on every single front.
The fight will never end, all we can ever do is fight for improvement.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: