The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: I'm still not seeing it.
I'm still not seeing it.
1. Today I pull the trigger on a guy who killed twenty people yesterday.
It is not legal for me to do this. Nor is it lawful for me to do this. Where's the difference?
2. Government indicts the killer, tries him, sentences him to death and executes him. This is both legal and lawful. Where's the difference?
I Googled for the question and came up with this on Wiki.answers:
According to that, it looks like "lawful" is used when referring to the "spirit" of the law, or to some theory of "natural law" or common law. "Legal" means the letter of the law, as interpreted by government courts. Does that seem about right to you? If so, then I was right the first time, in my use of "legal."
Recommended reading: The Most Dangerous Superstition, http://www.amazon.com/Most-Dangerous-Superstition-Larken-Ros...